Just to be sure ... I built a simple Copybook xbc without the in-memory passing of the data and it is working similarly.

Here is the simple XBC:

<FILETEST xmlns:xa="http://xaware.org/xas/ns1" xa:bizcomptype="COPYBOOK">
<xa:input />
<xa:description />
<xa:request xa:request_type="text2xml" xa:record_source="data/endWhenTrueOccurs.data" xa:format="fixed_length">
<xa:return />
</xa:request>
<xa:record_layout xa:record_start="0" xa:record_length="74">
<CONTACT xa:occurs="3">
<ID xa:start="0" xa:field_length="10" xa:pic_value="X(10)" />
<NAME xa:start="10" xa:field_length="10" xa:pic_value="X(10)" />
<STATE xa:start="20" xa:field_length="2" xa:pic_value="X(2)" />
</CONTACT>
<DATE xa:start="66" xa:field_length="8" xa:pic_value="X(8)" />
</xa:record_layout>
<xa:response>
<element>
<contact>
<id>%ID%</id>
<name>%NAME%</name>
<state>%STATE%</state>
</contact>
<date>%DATE%</date>
</element>
</xa:response>

and the results are the same. It still fails to substitute the first 2 record fields.

If, however, I manually add the xa:occurs="3" to the response element, the results are returned accurately. I manually added the xa:occurs="3" to the first example - which passes data from the input parameter value and that example works as well.

I'm not sure that users will know to manually define how many response records to return, is there some change we should make to the wizard to handle this for them?

Thanks.